Home > Tutorials
Time Sheet Entry - Testing™
Introduction
This document outlines the input testing of the Time Sheet Entry screen and provided timesheets. This document outlines the problems with the data input as well as posting a number of questions relating to the quality of the data in the provided timesheets.
|
Getting There:
[ N/A ]
|
Introduction
We have used the timesheets covering 20/10/10 - 02/11/10, & 10/11/10 - 11/11/10.
20/10/10 Ellenbrook
No sub-contractors were entered as these names are not in the uploaded data.
21/10/10 Ellenbrook
No sub-contractors were entered as these names are not in the uploaded data.
Plant VH277 is not in the uploaded data & hence was not entered.
22/10/10 Ellenbrook
No sub-contractors were entered as these names are not in the uploaded data (the databases that were uploaded from the original employee and equipment listings).
Top of Page
23/10/10 Ellenbrook
No sub-contractors were entered as these names are not in the uploaded data.
25/10/10 Ellenbrook
The total time shown on the paper timesheet are incorrect for the period 07.00 - 13.30.
No sub-contractors were entered as these names are not in the uploaded data.
Top of Page
26/10/10 Ellenbrook
Only 1 sub-contractor was entered, all others are not in the uploaded data. The piece of equipment Bobcat was not entered as we do not know the item id.
Top of Page
27/10/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
Only 1 sub-contractor was entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
This site has the same job code as Ellenbrook, so the question is are these two sites the same. Otherwise how do we define the upper most level Project when we've been told that Project & Job Code are synonymous?
Some of the timesheet data is quite difficult to understand (hand-writing), and hence pieces of information may not have been completely entered.
Employee D. Tehuia is not in the uploaded data.
Top of Page
28/10/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
Employee D. Tehuia is not in the uploaded data.
Top of Page
29/10/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
A number of the sub-contractors are no in the uploaded data
In entering the employee data, we've also entered the equipment that an employee worked with as per the timesheet. There is a seperate section relating to the equipment. However, as an example Employee W. Dunn worked on Plant WL32 for a total of 8 hours, but the plant itself is noted as working for 7.x hours.
So, what does this mean - when the time of an employee + plant is different to the time of the plant itself. What logic do you wish applied to these entries. The equipment export has not yet been written so what logic do you want applied, as the timesheet need only have 1 reference to the plant (e.g. against the employee), and we can break the employee and plant link into employee payroll hours and the same hours for the equipment.
Top of Page
01/11/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
Only a number of sub-contractors were entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
02/11/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
Only a number of sub-contractors were entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
Top of Page
10/11/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
Only a number of sub-contractors were entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
11/11/10 Lexia St1, St2, St4
Only a number of sub-contractors were entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
Only a number of plant items were entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
Only a number of the external hire items were entered, all others are not in the uploaded data.
Top of Page
Summary
Overall, we have been able to upload approximately 160 timesheet items.
As a result of the bulk upload performed in these tests, we have found processing speed ups that we believe will enhance the user interface & have scheduled these for our own development to enhance the interface. (link to item)
Top of Page
Top of Page
See Also
 PowerForce Controls
Article updated by PowerForce Software on Monday, October 18, 2010.
Copyright ©2007-2013 Envizion Systems - All Rights Reserved - Terms of Use.
|